Comparative test new Chevrolet Corvette Z06 and Nissan GT-R Nismo

The burden of expectations: two charged sports car race to the finish line neck and neck.

On every new car as soon as it becomes aware of his upcoming debut, automakers, members of the press and fans of the brand puts great hopes. Arguments and heated debates are multiplied when we try to draw conclusions about how this car will go and what will take place in its segment, based on the information available. Most demonstrations and numerous premature judgments concerning class sports cars, which leads us to two striking examples.

Chevrolet Corvette Z06, like the Nissan GT-R NISMO, was one of the most anticipated premier last year. The first was thoroughly improved exterior and interior, as well as an excellent engine and a corresponding suspension, which will allow him to encroach on the title supercar-killer (killer supercar), deservedly assigned to the second, completely revised version titled “supercar-killer” of this decade. Both cars promise dynamics at the level of machines in two to three times more expensive, and both achieve it in completely different ways.

Chevrolet chose traditional for the 21st century formula. 6.2-liter V8 with a supercharger, located in the front, coupled with a seven-speed manual transmission, which is trying to convey 650 horsepower and 880 Nm of torque to the rear axle by means of an electronic limited-slip differential, poluslik Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 and aerodynamic kit Chevrolet’s Z07 Stage III (more suitable to participate in this test model with an eight automatic transmission was available at the time of comparison).

Nissan chose not exactly new, but not the traditional way, as a Chevrolet. V6 engine with twin turbos and a working volume of 3.8 liters sends power to a six-speed automatic transmission with two clutches located in the rear of the machine, which immediately spins the rear wheels, but constantly monitors the level of grip of the front wheels to the road and, if necessary part of them transmits torque to maintain optimum dynamics. NISMO influence can be seen in the increased to 600 hp and 652 Nm of power, as well as improved aerodynamics and patches transmission and control systems work all-wheel drive.

Since the history of the model began in 2007 in Japan with the R35 GT-R, Nissan is constantly improving complex software GT-R NISMO, and this time is not an exception. In this case, changes were made to the system of control of the engine to remove a small dip in power in the midrange, we noticed a little earlier, in August last year. The result is noticeable as a pilot, and in time the circle. From the place of the 1760 NISMO pound accelerate to 60 miles / hour (96 km / h) in 2.9 seconds, as before, but now kvoter passes for 11 seconds (speed at the finish of 203.7 km / h), which is one tenth of a second and more for two km / hr faster. Failure? What is failure? An excellent result, but the advantage Z06 50 hp and 229 Nm in combination with at mass 160 kg (1600 kg) should affect its performance. In reality it is not. Powerful Corvette need 3.3 seconds to dial from a place 96 km / h and 11.4 seconds to go 402 meters (at the finish he accelerates to 200 km / h). Admirers of the model will notice that the new product on the tenth of a second and 2.9 km / h slower on both counts than the first model in 2015, which we tested. The reason, in our opinion, lies in aerodynamics. That first Z06 was equipped with aerodynamic bodywork Stage II, and this car is “dressed” in the scope of Stage III, which adds a massive rear spoiler and front splitter. At high speeds they offer undeniable advantages in handling, but the extra downforce that they generate, means additional resistance. If we compare it with the NISMO, Corvette is hampered not only by friction, but also its more sluggish transmission and the need to send all the power just two wheels.

However, in the arsenal of the Corvette have other tricks. For example, its massive uglekeramicheskie brake discs, wider and grippy front tires and lighter weight allow it to slow down more efficiently. With a speed of 96 km / h Z06 stops at 27.7 meters. GT-R NISMO this takes 29.5 meters.

Generally, these machines are designed not to participate in drag Racing, although this does not prevent them from being spectacular in the discipline. These are cars for the track, which you can drive on normal roads. They are designed for cornering, and in this they are also very good. The median NISMO 1,3g to test for lateral acceleration and 23.1 seconds in the “eight” with an average lateral acceleration of 0,99g make it one of the best cars ever fell into our hands. Despite the fact that his “eight” was 0.2 seconds slower than the other tested NISMO, these 0,99g – much better and are the best indicator for the GT-R in general (the previous record 0,91g).

Both cars provide the dynamics at the level of cars in two and three times more expensive.

No matter how tricky GT-R may be, for the Z06 it is not a competitor, because the combination of speed and grip make the last almost new record. At the moment, Z06 showed the second time in the “eight”, second only to the Porsche 918 Spyder. His time was 22.3 seconds, lateral acceleration in average 1,06g, which is 0.2 seconds faster than the other Z06, not to mention the acceleration (was 0,98g). If you analyze the passage of the route in detail, the Corvette higher speeds on straight stretches and brake later and harder than NISMO; in the corners, he was also faster. And all this in spite of the slight but steady oversteer, which is expressed in about the middle of the turn, which, if miss the moment, can easily go into an uncontrollable skid steer followed. In a simple test for lateral acceleration Z06 again improved his time and has strengthened its position as the car with the best grip of all that we were tested: on average, 1,17g, the previous record 1,16g.

Unfortunately Corvette Z06, all these figures are not able to help him on the track. We released both cars to the legendary track Willow Springs, so that they can properly display their abilities and unleash the monstrous power on the track Big Track, known as “the fastest track in the West.” Its length is 3895 meters: it turns nine, ranging from steep and technically difficult to pass up high and long, straight stretches that allow powerful cars from achieving their potential. We are pleased to invite our driver Randy Pobst to conduct this test and it showed an impressive lap time of 1: 25.70 on the NISMO and a 1: 27.10 at the wheel Corvette.

How could this happen? We were surprised no less than you are now. In Z06 indisputable advantage in weight, power and cohesion, and yet he lost his opponent more than two seconds. In fact, he did not outstripped even far less powerful (and easy) Porsche 911 GT3, and this in spite of the enormous difference in the 175 hp and 442 Nm. That’s what the data show: Z06 mainly NISMO ahead and developed a high speed in the apex of most turns, but NISMO began to accelerate earlier out of corners. Moreover, NISMO was noticeably faster on the straights, showed higher than the Z06, speed: 9.5 km / h on a straight line and accelerating at 11.2 km / h at the finish.

The only explanation we could find, it’s aerodynamics. Big Z06 front splitter and rear spoiler create a vertical downforce, which helps the car to be faster in the apex of the turn, but the additional drag on his brakes booster lines. On the “eight” is not felt because of low speeds. To verify the correctness of our assumptions, we have removed the central bar spoiler and asked Randy to do another lap around the track. As we expected, Z06 added to the direct (1.6 km / h faster on the booster line), but slowed down in the corners, because the absence of additional downforce provokes him to a more pronounced oversteer. Add to this the tendency to overheat Z06 after the first round, which makes it the computer to limit the power to avoid further heating, so that the machine becomes even slower.

“Feels like the car faster (than showing her lap), but I would not say it 650 horses – said Randy. – I just thought that it would be much faster. “He also lamented the fact that she had too much oversteer in the apex, and the gas pedal too spicy, so dosing capacity was extremely difficult. Then he said something that we from him never heard before: “I would add to this car a little understeer, it is clearly not enough. It would be trimmed back, to the front of excellent adhesion. “Then he added: “Those circles when I connect PTM (System Performance Traction Management), I realized that the work itself took a stability control system. I really do not like it, but it helps to cope with excess understeer. “He also preferred mode of Sport, and not Track, since the suspension settings in this mode proved to be too rigid. “She just beat me, despite the fact that this track can not be called hard.” There were also positive developments: “The brakes are phenomenal. The sensitivity of the pedals, huge potential, these brakes are much better than the GT-R. Z06 is much more interesting to manage. It is a challenge. GT-R is too boring. And I like the manual. This is old-school. I myself old-school ».

GT-R Randy has not caused a flurry of emotions. “He always keeps everything under control. They removed the excess understeer, which was in the previous version. It is more balanced. I would like to see it in slicks and with larger brakes. I think I would handle it. Power delivery is also improved. “

NISMO has always focused on the fact, without causing too much bright emotions.

Still in a state of shock from the results of a trip around the track, we went with Carlos Lago one of the best ways to California to check whether the test results will be reflected on track to situations in the real world. Under the new conditions rivalry began to gain degrees. We grumbled and doubted, discussing how the advantages and disadvantages of each of the vehicles counterbalance each other. Lago found out that he will be driving faster NISMO due to unrealistic ability of the car out of the corners at high speed. I found that the powerful brakes Z06 will give me confidence and enable faster cornering, where incredible grip provides good speed. That oversteer that we found on the track, on the road does not manifest itself. We agreed that the higher landing in the NISMO provides better visibility, but the car seems to be more severe, and still growing sense of heel and then there is no trace in the lower and sports Z06. Also, it was impossible to ignore the fact that the NISMO harder Corvette, which is felt in the turns and braking. In the end we agreed that the Z06 little fun in the management due to a mechanical transmission, more athletic fit and gorgeous sound.

When it was time to go in the back, very not a short path, doubts I had. Magnetorheological dampers third generation, set in the Z06, remain the best in its class and give it an unrivaled comfort on the road, but not so on a hard NISMO, even in the soft mode Comfort. The desire to seek out NISMO every flaw in the pavement very quickly tiring. Of course, the mechanics Z06 requires some effort and skill when driving in heavy traffic machines, but easy to grip makes this process is almost imperceptible. Where more problems delivering heat from the partition between the cabin and the engine compartment and the central tunnel; first I be fried legs and then heated the entire cabin. On the track and high speeds do not notice, because the engine compartment has time to cool ram air, but during rush hour can only include air conditioning.

When it’s time to wrap up, we were stunned. Corvette Z06 was better in everyday life and in the corners. Nissan GT-R on the track faster and direct. On a good road, these machines are equally comfortable. How to choose the winner? At first, I decided to ask the opinion of Randy, find out what kind of car he liked more. His response: «Corvette. GT-R is too boring in its uncompromising efficiency (on the track). But if I wanted to drive on the track, I would choose Nissan ».

In general, we have come to the same conclusion. Z06 us to have fun, but also from the fact that NISMO – an excellent option for the track, it is impossible to dismiss. If we choose the best car for the driver, the sensitivity Z06 and its fascination could provide additional points, but it never happened. These cars are designed for the track, and there GT-R is better, though Corvette very good, and for two-thirds of the price. GT-R is worth much more expensive, but in his case, get exactly what you pay for. Point in our debate put the fact that in spite of the difference in the cost of NISMO can do more with less. He received his old body, it is much harder, it is less powerful brakes, tires its smaller size, it lags behind in power, and he has much less torque. And, despite all this, on the road it is as swift as the Z06, but on the track leaves the competition behind. To overcome such obstacles and significant victory over the Corvette, we give the victory in our test Nissan GT-R NISMO, albeit with a minimum separation from the opponent.

Godzilla again ahead

When we left a diagram best laps Z06 and GT-R, it was greatly puzzled. So whether Nissan faster at higher speeds? Is Corvette in the second long hairpin much more grip than the GT-R? The data do not lie. (We wrote both circles with two loggers Vbox to provide the most accurate data). But on both lines, accelerating and finishing, Nissan each time was faster Corvette. Different settings transmissions? Aerodynamics? Overheating? Meanwhile, the more laps we did, the worse it gets Z06 grip the road in the second hairpin. The heated air increases the pressure in the tires? Also, pay attention to pause, Randy made between the fourth and fifth turns on the Z06 (not to waste time for changing gear) and its very early quenching before the ninth turn, caused a lack of confidence in the successful completion of at high speed. Often, such a comparison of data requires a lot of time, which is not always enough for a detailed analysis that would allow to get answers to all questions. But we do know that in spite of fluctuations in speed graph, Nissan GT-R quickly became leaders and not give up their positions until the finish, which came with a margin of 85 meters.

Comparative test new Chevrolet Corvette Z06 and Nissan GT-R Nismo

BMW tested the liquid new cooling system of the engine air new safety car for Moto GP

According to engineers units M Performance, the new system not only increases the return of the motor, but also reduces fuel consumption. According to engineers units M Performance, the new system not only increases the return of the motor, but also reduces fuel consumption.

The BMW Group has extended the details of the new car safety Championship Moto GP. They will once again become a coupe M4, but in the 2015 season, the car has received some fine-tuning.

Under the hood of the car is still in row “Six” with two turbochargers. The main innovation is the liquid cooling system air intake. According to engineers units M Performance, this solution not only enhances the efficiency of the motor, but also reduces fuel consumption.

The principle of operation is reduced to the news that water is sprayed into the reservoir to reduce the likelihood of knocking in the engine. This allows you to set the optimum ignition timing.

As a result, the process of ignition of the mixture becomes more efficient and occurs at a lower temperature. Since the density of the cold air is higher than the heat in the combustion chamber gets more oxygen, which in turn increases the return load of the motor and reduces its parts.

Required for operation of the system water is stored in a frost-five-liter tank with pump and valves located in the trunk of the car. Water is supplied under pressure of 10 bar. The delivery rate depends on the load and number of revolutions of the engine temperature.

BMW representatives say that in front of a dynamic ride around the track a tank of water needed to fill. When driving on public roads recharge takes approximately every fifth visit refueling.

It is expected that in the near future a new air cooling system appears on serial machines BMW.

BMW tested the liquid new cooling system of the engine air new safety car for Moto GP

Family Car of the Year: Mercedes C-Class

Two identical Mercedes C-Class, two full tank. Very different ways

FIRST DAY

Sam Philip: This is an unusual race. First prize is waiting, and finish at everyone. But overall start – in Stuttgart, home of Mercedes. We have two twin-wagon C220 CDI, tucked under the string. We photographer Simon go to the south, and Vijay dressed as a conqueror of Antarctica, go with Tom to the north. The Aim? Go as far as possible on a single tank, with one condition: the places where we zaglohnem should not be in German exotic. Points given for courage here, and not just for the distance.

At C220 larger tank (66 liters), while the standard C-Class – 41 liters. Official fuel consumption – 4.1 liters / 100 km. Theoretically, you can drive 1,600 km. That is, for many, many miles before refueling.

Not counting the voluminous stomach, the new C-Class station wagon for our race and the rest. Mercedes hung him the label “business class”. This comfortable, luxurious, full of technology midsize wagon. I unfold gray barn on Bentsshtrasse south to Austria and Italy’s Amalfi coast (if we go doedem). And see how Vijay crawls to the north.

Vijay Pattni: Tom and I will do everything properly and majestically rolled up to the finish line somewhere in Scandinavia. In Norway, unless specifically. The first step to success – go light, but I can not throw Tom and his heaviest equipment. Hence, we find other ways to not accelerate above a hundred, to anticipate the flow, go coasting and include air conditioning. I’m sorry, Tom.

Mercedes, infection, at a gas station to the report, he was ready to drive 925 miles. And just before the end of Denmark to go more than a thousand. Yes, Sam and Simon fell lot more enjoyable. Prior to Hirtshals – the town on the coast of Denmark – can only be reached by motorway. 1170 km boredom. Tom and I decide to settle accounts with the unpleasant part in one fell swoop.

BMW AND AUDI FLASHED BY LIKE LIGHTNING

On the way there are two insights. First, fuel economy, you become kilometromanom. When the distance before refueling increases after ten minutes, you scream with happiness. When the flow rate increases – you’re black clouds.

Second, go on the highway on Tortoise 100 km / h is very scary. We find solace in the hide and seek for the same slug – trucks. Glued to the bumper of Mr. Shenker bringing up who knows what, we use low-pressure area and hide from whistling past the cars.

After two hours, and only one hundred and fifty kilometers, we have increased the projected distance from 925 to 1160 km. That’s where the fun! We say goodbye to Mr. Schenker, who turns to Bamberg, and go further to the north, into the night.

Fifteen hundred kilometers at a speed of 88 km / h – in anticipation of Sam and his face Vijaya seven hours did not flinch a muscle

SF: While the team “Northern losers” dragged through Germany, the company “Southern Pretty Boy” has slipped three countries: the southern corner of Germany, Austria and drove to northern Italy. Unfortunately, this advantage is bought at the cost of a decent piece of our fuel reserves. While Vijay trudged through the flat central Germany, we darted through the Alps. And in the Alps impossible to save goryuchku.

Forget. Life is too short to hide behind the wagons and switch to 1300 rev / min. We fuck on the three-lane highway at 145 km / h, watching as each passed us eats five kilometer on the display. When Simon asked me not to drive, I patiently explained that go more slowly on the highway just dangerous. Patrol immediately selects the right, if you go less 140. When we climb into the Alps, I notice that Simon google phone “canister diesel Austria.”

About ten o’clock at an altitude of one mile above sea temperature behind -3◦S and hover in the air snowflakes. We stop for the night in an empty ski resort Vipiteno just behind the Italian border. C-CLass believes that fuel remains at 644 km. Amalfi much further. It is good that in a restaurant full of hot pizza and beer. I send photos Vijay our dinner and get a rude answer. It seems northerners still going.

VP: Somewhere between Hamburg and Hanover Tom amuses me a story about Donald Krauherste, English sailor, who in the sixties participated in the round the world yacht race. When he realized that not doplyvet, he lied about his coordinates, and then mad and killed himself. Good plan, I decide. But before committing suicide, I’ll kill Sam, because he imposed me north. Fuel economy on the German autobahn must be enrolled in the third article of the European Convention on Human Rights. This is a real torture. You do not take their eyes off the flow sensor, occasionally balls from stoplights. And when you get more leisurely carrier, it is necessary to perform the slowest in the world overtaking, checking in the mirror, no flies on you whether another meteor.

By night boredom becomes unbearable. No traffic lights, only lasers million BMW, Audi and vans, flying by at the speed of lightning.

At two o’clock in the morning we we reach Denmark, fuel remains at 772 km. I notice that the coating Danish roads better, which should reduce the rolling resistance and increase efficiency. I’m happy. O God, that I become?

After three and a half hours after a fleeting moment of happiness we finally we reach the northern edge of Denmark and valimsya to bed. Sleep is nothing at all.

DAY TWO

SF: Just one hour after Vijay and Tom went to sleep in the cheapest hotel in Denmark, we woke up with Simon frosty clear morning in the Italian Alps. Great European array immersed in the splendor of autumn. Bright blue sky above the lush green meadows and snow-capped peaks, quiet dawn in a light haze spiced aroma of burning wood. In this morning, the mood at the height of that life – a miracle. If it were not depressing thought that for the next two days will have to travel 1,050 miles on half a tank …

Plans to save crumbling after news of the terrible traffic jam at Bolzano. We’re going to detour through the mountains and find a terrific pass. Paso di Pennes winds along the slopes of the Alps at an altitude of 2200 meters. Sparkling paradise of eternal snow over the forest and babbling brooks. Streamer on impossible to keep consumption of 4 l / 100 km. To the top of the pass covered 32 km, and the instrument – 160 km. Florence so do not hold on. But on the way down we wins back 48 km …

WE GO FURTHER … OR RATHER, CRAWL AT A SPEED OF 88 KM / H

VP: Rubbing red eyes, we wake up in Hirtshals, which resembles a town of “The Truman Show”, full of seagulls and robbers, trawlers and ominous silence.

Night highway recall nightmare, in which, however, Mercedes was our best friend. Extremely comfortable (thanks to air suspension), well-equipped and reliably constructed. This business class.

Ferry from Hirtshals to Kristiansand Norwegian is 130 km, and then – along the coast to the west, while “Benz” is not out of steam. We pray for calm, hoping to take a nap, but the North Sea meets us furious pumping, – instead of refreshing sleep four o’clock horror.

While steam throws the waves, I understand that we: a) economy, thanks to the monstrous engines to Rolls-Royce, and b) I do not salt. We approach the late, just a few hours before dark and sigh of relief tread on the ground of a third country, Norway.

SF: I want to confess something. While Vijay was of the waves, we have committed fraud. No, worse. We tried cheated, but did not. Somewhere near Trento I broke down. Amalfi has 837 km and fuel must come to an end through the 483. I could not bear the shame, and thus have to refuel. “Only 20 liters” – crazy junky excuse in breaking. A single dose. No one will know. But damn diesel heater was not working. Wrinkled tanker, 60-year-old, a subsidiary tanned old man growled something in Italian. “Inglese, skuzi” – I apologize. He shrugged and said, “If Not possible.” “Can not?” – I asked. “No possible,” – he repeated, and went into the shadows. We left with nothing. This man saved us from ourselves.

This phenomenon of the Holy Spirit spodviglo I collect will in a fist. Cruise control at 100 km / h, turn off the air conditioner for home and crawl Ferrari, Lamborghini and balsamic. In this ride has something psychotherapy. No need to worry about the cops and speed cameras, the soul at rest.

An hour later, I changed my mind. Force people to save fuel – a crime worse than torture kittens. Another hour – and I wondered if it will work, holding rudder foot, take a nap in the backseat.

But we have to fight for miles. One ekodatchikov C-Class shows how much “clean km” you have earned. Fiction, but it’s nice. C-Class believes that we scored 130 bonus miles, while trudging along the Apennines. On the rise in two-lane truck taxiing in the fast lane, but can not be dispersed. We beat on the brakes and pour their selective mat as sailors syndrome Tourrettes. For us, and so every extra millimeter gas pedal or brakes – a mortal sin. Evening we meet in the mansion at Orvieto, wine and homemade pizza. Can be regarded as a reward for what we resist the temptation …

DAY THREE

SF: 386 km from Orvieto to Sorrento, straight on the highway A1 – real flour. The gauge indicates that the tank is full of a quarter. We dump the ballast (bottles of water and dirty socks), exhibiting a cruise to 88 km / h and sit in silence, watching as the glacier is melting at a rate of fuel. Judging by the malevolent Vijaya text messages, they reap what they have sown the first day of austerity.

VP: Today our harsh epic turned into a pleasant journey. Good Lord, Norway with a drop of sunshine in the autumn cold just fine. Stunning fjords, mountain views and a sense of God’s being.

Way from Kristiansand to Stavanger lies on the coastal highway where the speed is limited. But we have something that. Our goal – a beautiful place away from Stuttgart, and we almost there. Have time to think over how to characterize the C220. He was well-proven over the three days, coped with everything from exhausting the motorway to the narrow streets, from slush to the frozen asphalt. He gently took us to this area. Caring and considerate companion, who knows a lot about comfort.

We drove 1,450 km (!), And on the devices icon flashes to a gas station. Cautiously we propolzayem another 22 km and get up on the shores of beautiful Lake especially, before you reach Stavanger. Passed 1470 km, and in front of us views breathtaking. The trick is done.

Northerners traveled 1,470 km on one tank and got almost to Stavanger. Team southerners stalled over 1370 km after the start, on the embankment of Sant’Agnello. Sam swears he squandered all diesel alpine serpentine. The rest assured that he just does not know how to ride

2840 km of track for two. Sam shows a smug Buddha under the southern sun

SF: Northerners finished and exhaled, and in southern Italy solid nerves. Before Naples, 60 km from Amalfi, C-Class reported that the fuel ran out. Do not want to die in the most unattractive city in Europe, so we continue to crawl along the slow lane at a speed of 80 km / h, at the slightest opportunity sticking to the waggons. Sweat rolls hail not only from the 25-degree heat with no air conditioning – we expect that just about hear the death rattle of diesel and sharply stand. In the long tunnel under the north-east corner of the Amalfi voltage monstrous. If we stand now, clog the entire tunnel.

Finally we leave on blinding daylight and roll downhill along the waterfront Sant’Agnello. Golden evening light glare on the azure waters over which the circling seagulls. Two thick Italian argue, snarling and poking each other with your fingers. We are on the spot: 1370 km. Our tranzhirstvo the first day cost us 101 km. Northerners won, they went further. But we have cheaper beer and better coffee. And the heat! Decide who wins.

VP: Humble yourself, Sam. We won. In the theory of tank C-Class can squeeze all 1,600 km, but in theory you can kiss passionately mako shark. I do not recommend trying to neither the first nor the second. After these works you become unpleasant person.

But the most vivid impression still remains the C-Class. He is the ideal travel companion: a quiet, well-equipped Touring Year, who has never done anything wrong. Do you want this? Hurry – one we threw on the outskirts of Stavanger, and the other – in the port of Sant’Agnello. Just grab a canister with diesel fuel.

Family Car of the Year: Mercedes C-Class

Audi A1 & A1 Sportback: Bright resident of Monte Carlo Test-Drive

Fly to Nice, take the car and take off in Monte Carlo easier than large, powerful sports car, of which there are plenty, and the striker in the hatchback class. Especially when it is bright and premium and is not lost on the background of famous luxury cars – such as the updated Audi A1.

At first glance updates hatchbacks not highly salient. But grille with sharp edges, headlights with LED elements and an abundance of horizontal lines give the A1 and A1 Sportback is more mature and dynamic look. The car seems even wider, when in fact it is only a couple of centimeters in length increased. Particularly strong emphasis on sportiness S line packages due to the increased air intake area, overlays on sills, rear spoiler, diffuser and expressive blued shotgun exhaust system.

As before, the updated Audi A1 is available in two body styles: 3-door hatchback (pictured) and 5-door Sportback.

Five new exterior colors emphasize the sporty design and expression. For trehdverki A1 arches over doorways, and five-door A1 Sportback for all dome roof and exterior mirror housings are available in contrasting colors, appeared fresh application options.

At the forefront of the lineup are sporting 231-horsepower all-wheel drive modification  Audi S1 and Quattro S1 Sportback Quattro.

Those who are more concerned about the economy and the environment, certainly interested in two new 3-cylinder (!) Machine series Ultra: petrol 1.0 TFSI (95 hp) and diesel 1.4 TDI (92 hp). That’s just us they do not plan to deliver.

In the design, you can choose a design or sport direction. Now and A1 can install Audi Drive Select.

The first in Europe will be offered petrol 1.4 TFSI. Its 150-strong version with a 6-step “mechanics” perfectly pulls in a very wide range of speeds. The Audi A1 accelerates smoothly and confidently in every gear, the narrow serpentine rock studs allows you to stay in the third stage, and the second hatchback climbed the hill with almost space. And even when at the bottom disappears thrust, the engine does not stall tries and escape from turboyamy, fun and inspiration unwinds.

Petrol 1.4 TFSI is available in two power outputs – 125 and 150 hp From the first motor A1 S tronic gaining 8.8 per hundred with (A1 Sportback – in 8.9 c) and consumes an average of 4.9 liters of gasoline per 100 kilometers.

A more powerful version of the engine accelerates the A1 to 100 km / h in 7.8 with (A1 Sportback 7.9 c) and consumes an average of 4.7 liters per 100 kilometers. The engine is equipped with cylinder cut-COD (cylinder on demand). When kickback torque of 100 Nm and less work at 1400-4000 rev / min or coasting COD disable the second and third cylinder.

Electromechanical power steering for A1 is completely new. It changes the degree of enhancement in the speed-dependent and gives pleasure in sports driving.

Residence permit

Updated Audi A1 is not lost even in areas of high concentration of luxury Rolls-Royce and pumped Ferrari, Lamborghini and Maserati. Behind the wheel of the agile hatchback do not feel discomfort on the narrow streets of Monte Carlo and the Principality of Monaco mountain serpentines. It turns out even on equal worn with smart Brabus, Renault Clio RS and different variations Mini. And at the end of winter hatchbacks appear in our country, and then we will know how to update Audi A1 prepared for life in Ukraine.

Rear lights with new graphics. Here are just a little girl cheated dynamic direction indicators, which we have already seen in other updated Audi.

Resume – Audi A1 & A1 Sportback

Body and comfort

A1 before has a wide customization options, they are now even more. For the model proposed design and sport direction, Luxury Line and Active kit, as well as accessories from quattro GmbH. All in all, for updated A1, you can create more than one million color combinations.

Changes are not highly salient, and on the road is not immediately distinguished restyling version.

Powertrain and dynamics

Robotic 7-speed S tronic transmission with two clutches can be installed in a couple of any engine. All motors from 90 to 192 hp New or upgraded. They became 10% more economical, some power is increased.

Gamma engines in our country will be limited.

Finance and equipment

The standard equipment includes six airbags and protection against a second collision. Components MMI navigation plus and Audi connect services allow you to use online services and easy to work with Internet resources. Now for the A1 and A1 Sportback is available sport suspension package S line, adjustable shock absorbers, and Audi Drive Select system with three programs: Auto, Efficiency and Dynamic.

If we use the proposed options, this machine can be more expensive than larger models. And in our country size matters.

Audi A1 & A1 Sportback: Bright resident of Monte Carlo Test-Drive

2015 Land Rover Discovery Sport - a new test drive

Farewell Freelander! After two generations of the compact SUV with automatic all wheel drive Land Rover in the family is no longer a place at the dinner table. His place in February took the car of a higher class with increased functionality. How is it linked to its off-road performance and road manners, sheds light our first test in snowy Iceland.

In the future the range of Land Rover Discovery Sport relies on functionality. He will be able to carry up to seven passengers, easier to evolve and accommodate more luggage. Reborn Freelander leaves oversaturated crossover segment where the Briton to compete harder and try to break into the niche of luxury SUV’ov as the BMW X3 and Audi Q5. Thus, Land Rover responds to requests from its customers, who ever look at the big Range Rover, but can not afford them.

After three new models, Range Rover Discovery Sport – the first all-new Land Rover in the past more than ten years. The new model is superior to its predecessor in length and four inches by eight – wheelbase. This format is still fit into the standards adopted in the class of compact SUV, but the Discovery Sports unlike direct competitors offers a third row of seats. And even if he was not ordered as an option, Land Rover presents a new format for practitioners: the trunk can accommodate majestic 981-1698 liters. Including using shifted by 16 centimeters rear seats. This was made possible thanks to a new, compact multi-link rear suspension, which distinguishes the novice from technically related Evoque.

Discovery Sport differs from the Freelander more rounded shapes and relies on style. With its rakish profile and gloss in detailing a beginner is likely related to the models of Range Rover, rather than with a shy model line Land Rover. This theme can also be seen inside where found vysokoprobny design and an abundance of first-class materials.

On the road behaves majestically

Behind the wheel of Discovery Sports felt differently than technically related Evoque. This is mainly explained by the different position of the driver’s seat: his pillow set a few millimeters above and back – more upright. However, planting is still lightweight and visibility is much better than his seductive cousin.

Chassis set quite comfortable, only urban speeds body shakes on 19-inch wheels. C this problem must cope adaptive dampers MagneRide, which will be available as an option. With an increase in the rate of progress is truly luxurious – reserved for swinging and low noise.

Steering is no different reference feedback, but precise and sharp, so that the passage of the ligaments turns unable to make the mobility of cars. The base offers an improved 6-speed manual transmission, but the supplement for automatic, definitely worth it. 9-speed automatic transmission is no longer so nervous. Automatic transmission not only gently and playfully adapts switches, but also allows you to extract from the engine thrust, not forcing the tachometer pointer to the top of the scale. Accelerating dynamics and not a loser: with 9 gears acceleration to 100 km / h improves by half a second with the same 2.2-liter diesel engine.

No compromises outside of paved roads

As befits Land Rover, Discovery Sport outside of paved roads makes no compromises: who did not order an economical option with front-wheel drive, can expect to fully participate in adventurous nature outings. In dotted with dirt roads, rivers and rocks Iceland Discovery Sport climbs on snowy hills, storm tracks, rows in the sand and forwarded ford. And with a new wheel-drive system Active Driveline he is doing and where the drivers have finished the confidence and courage. Three electronically controlled clutch and a plurality of electronic assistants, which manages the system Terrain Response, require the driver only one thing – to press on the gas and indicate the course. There is not even a button of compulsory inclusion of all-wheel drive and locking clutch, which plays the role of the central differential.

Obviously, in the Land Rover were able to squeeze out of system capacity with four-wheel drive theoretical maximum. Anyway, moving on a parallel course Dicso 4 off-road can not go further, but lagging behind in the slush winding asphalt road.

Laconic tools, simple operation

Thus, the ride does not require undue effort. Contribution to the relaxation and making new interior. Sitting in the front get much more freedom than in the Evoque, and elegant interior is impressive, if somewhat conservative simplicity: for important messages for the first time in a classroom equipped with flat screen (optional) tools is hard to beat in their clarity, and the center of the instrument panel is decorated with a touch screen completely new multimedia system, which replaces most of the buttons and controls.

The motors are not new, but to write them early

Against the background of such a technical stuffing as automatic emergency braking, airbag for pedestrians and automatic high beams, engines is far from being the most outstanding units. Discovery Sports has not got a new family of engines, which have been developed for Jaguar XE, and it starts with familiar units Evoque. Nevertheless, there is a choice of 2.2-liter diesel engine 190 hp and turbobenzinovym engine that extracts 240 hp Two liters of working volume. None of them can not help feeling a lack of power. Especially good diesel: mostly quiet and well impressed with his muscular 420 Nm of torque assertive newcomer.

Autumn range will join Discovery Sport version with a drive only the front wheels. In combination with a 150-horsepower diesel engine manufacturer promises a 4.5 liter average fuel consumption – is quite competitive rate, while the powerful all-wheel drive version numbers do not fit into the best, although it was middle-aged members of the class. After all, despite the fact that the Land Rover uses a lot of aluminum and magnesium to reduce weight, Discovery Sport weighs no less than 1.8 tonnes, so that his name is not entirely untrue. And even diesel quickly goes to figure 9-10 liters of fuel per trip computer display, if you drive aggressively, while the gasoline engine requires another 2-3 liters more.

VERDICT

Land Rover boldly examines the territory of Range Rover – he has already entered it, using the technique and technology junior representative luxury family. And even added a lot of myself compact rear suspension, a modified four-wheel drive and the latest security systems. Discovery Sport proportionally added in price, justifying it with greater capacity and better finish. High practicality remains dignity Land Rover, as well as the talent to conquer the roads.

2015 Land Rover Discovery Sport - a new test drive

2015 Nissan X-Trail New Test Drive

Remember, in the past generation Nissan Qashqai crossover is available as a “2” with a stretched wheelbase and an optional third row of seats? The new X-Trail is so much like the modern Qashqai that, by analogy with the Qashqai + 2 and it wants to be called X-Trail “minus two”: the new “X” for the first time received the third row of seats in this generation, but in Russia it offer not even as an option.

Let’s just take a look at what else we will not see in compared to other markets, which has released a new Nissan X-Trail. Oddly enough, but the third-row seat and say something special about. Perhaps, there is only a very specific version with turbodiesel, front-wheel drive and CVT – it we also will not.

But will everything else. On the ninth in December 2014 at a factory near St. Petersburg launched production of the following modifications: front-wheel drive with a gasoline engine 2.0 “mechanics” or with the CVT, all-wheel drive with engines 2.0 and 2.5 (only with a continuously variable transmission), as well as all-wheel drive version with turbodiesel 1 6, only “stick”. A very wide choice.

This variability allows nissanovtsy to believe that the current crossover satisfy customer with a variety of demands and will become just as popular as the predecessor model, which for seven years has found release in Russia more than 165 000 customers! Just think: this means that every year the owner of the X-Trail became more than 20 000 people in our country! Very impressive figure, further “weighted” by the presence of X-Trail in the top three best-selling crossovers Nissan all these years.

What will “take” the buyer a new X-Trail? Of course, first of all completely different, more modern and elegant appearance. Expand the audience is now possible at the expense of the female population (not a secret that in previous generations of this crossover chose mostly men), and by bringing under its wing those former “cubism” was not very much to their liking. However, one can not assume, and what fans of brutal forms of this interpretation, on the contrary, do not like it.

From afar, the new Nissan X-Trail, indeed, not so easy to distinguish from the previously released and, by the way, built on the same platform as the crossover Qashqai. Similar and shape of the headlights and the overall proportions of the body, and even the characteristic curve of the rear windows. But the front of the X-Trail is more massive, with a forward “Jaws”

For us, the appearance of X-Trail is not to say that has become quite unusual. Back in 2012 in Geneva, was presented the concept car Nissan Hi-Cross, from which our today’s hero is copied almost a carbon copy. In addition, before the advent of the Russian market of the new X-Trail, started selling “junior» Qashqai and “older» Pathfinder, which were actuated by the same style, single now for all crossover Nissan.

For the first time on how to look coming from Nissan crossovers in general and the X-Trail in particular, we have learned at the Motor Show 2012, where the Japanese presented their concept car Hi-Cross. Many design elements moved to new Qaqshqai, Pathfinder, and now on the X-Trail. Unfortunately, the same hybrid power plant, we in the new series X-Trail will not see, like a futuristic interior, from which there were only common features

Especially a lot in common in appearance X-Trail – and we have already notices at the beginning of the article – the model Qashqai. Immediately evident – native “brothers”! It seems that the difference is only in small details, but in fact, all body panels, of course, different. By the way, the Peter line until just punched the roof and sides, the remaining parts imported.

Behind the differences of Qashqai are more obvious. Roof falls not so fast, lights have a very different form and content, the lower part of the bumper is made with great relief, and the impressive size fifth door promises a much larger luggage compartment

Together with the appearance of Nissan is trying to bring to a common denominator, and the interiors of their crossovers. Interior of the new X-Trail is also reminiscent of the Qashqai. Such T-shaped architecture, such as the instrument panel, steering wheel and form a seven-inch screen multimedia system NissanConnect second generation.

The interior of the Nissan X-Trail – this is a huge step forward compared to the homely and outdated interior of the previous X-Trail. The quality of materials has increased by an order, there are more modern and interesting solutions. “Country” simplicity and “Cubism” forms now in the past

But the quality of the materials used on the X-Trail, better “kashkaevskogo” and, most importantly, just a cut above the gray “wooden” old-fashioned plastic and angular forms, which we observed in the interior of X-Trail the previous generation. If on the exterior is still possible to argue that uniquely salon became more comfortable, better quality, more expensive and has acquired a special gloss, until now for the X-Trail is not characteristic.

The instrument cluster Nissan X-Trail is almost exactly replicates per se with the crossover Qashqai. Concise, well-convenient. “Read” easily, and on a color display between the “wells” can bring a bunch of useful information. “Wealth” new salon X-Trail additionally emphasize the seven-inch display system NissanConnect 2.0 depressible, which, among other things, you can display an image of the circular review Around View Monitor, and activate the automatic “valet» Park Assist

Another great difference between the new X-Trail – ease of planting. The position of the driver – quite “passenger” range of adjustments – sufficient, and the seats Zero Gravity distribute the load so well that even a long journey they did not get tired. Very nice chair.

Zero Gravity seats are in good shape, optimum rigidity and a decent level of lateral support. The only drawback we would call too short pillow. Grown wheelbase of the new X-Trail has increased the space on the second row of seats. Login – convenient range of longitudinal adjustment – 140 mm, can be adjusted and the angle of the backrest and foot passengers can easily fit under the front seats. Unfortunately, because of the extra comforts for second-row passengers are only air on the center console and armrest

Among other things, became Nissan and spacious. Again, it is worth noting that they have a common platform with Qashqai – CMF (Common Module Family) – but the wheelbase is longer than the X-Trail, track wider, and the same suspension but constructively. Compared with the previous X-Trail generating new car is longer by 260 mm, up to 110 mm, wider than 200 mm and the wheelbase grew by 60 mm, which is bound to affect the increase in the free space in the cabin. In addition, the passengers of the second row, which is located amphitheater portion can move “sofa” in the longitudinal direction by 140 mm and change the angle of the backrest. Central tunnel behind no doors open to a wide angle (80 °), and the roof is no pressure on the head, even though such a dynamic “obstruction”.

Joint Platform Renault Nissan – CMF (Common Module Family) is a fully modular circuit consisting of five main components, which are marked in the image in different colors. Purple – cockpit, cabin; Orange – the engine compartment; green – rear end; Blue – Front; gray – electrical components. Shuffling between these components, the concern Renault Nissan intends to produce cars for the different classes. So, on the platform of CMF Nissan Qashqai and already produces X-Trail, and Renault, for example, is about to launch a new minivan Espace and Scenic, and the sedan Laguna. Just as long as about 14 models.

Returning to a common platform CMF, we note that the “filling» X-Trail is still very similar to the “stuffing» Qashqai. For example, both the car set essentially the same engines – petrol 2.0 liter turbo diesel and 1.6 liter. And if the latter do not change (it produces the same 130 horsepower and 320 Nm of torque, as in the Qashqai), the gasoline engine MR20D upgraded to X-Trail (full shift with the marking engine MR20DE on MR20DD). The compression ratio was increased from 10.2 to 11.2, and the modified algorithm injection system used for adjusting the valve, as the intake and on the exhaust. This made it possible to “steal” an extra three “horse” (was 141, was 144 hp) and four Nm (was 196, it was 200), while improving efficiency.

But buy Qashqai with more powerful (171 hp, 230 Nm) 2.5-liter engine, you can not, while for X Trail, this engine is still offered. The well-known QR25DE too little about modern: compression ratio grew from 9.6 to 10.0, and the adjustment phases have now and the intake and on release. They say that it will save as much as a tenth of the fuel.

On the center console is a comfortable arm CVT XTronic, as well as “Puck” transmission mode selection All Mode 4x4i. They remain three: 2WD, Auto and Lock (works up to a speed of 40 km / h)

As an all-wheel drive transmission X-Trail uses the same system All Mode 4×4 i, the rest of crossovers Nissan. The essence of her work is well known: it is a typical torque on demand, to throw back to the 50% of the time at a slipping front axle. Difficulty completing the rest of the stabilization system, podtormazhivaya desired wheel.

In this video we see how all-wheel drive All Mode 4×4 i help resist diagonal display. We experimented with different modes (Auto with ESP, Auto without ESP, Lock – in two variations). Even in the case of automatic distribution of the time-enabled stabilization system X-Trail with the task of coping. Little “downcast” in the beginning, after playing and turns variator gear ratio, the car still continues to move. However, the tests were performed on a coating with a very good hook. How it will be on a slippery – Check the spring.

During the test in Karelia case every. Some colleagues managed to get stuck in the soft snow, and even hang on the parapet, having touched with speed on corner entry. Sometimes we rented a car literally hands, sometimes used rope and shovel, but in all cases, help a good mood and constantly improving wheel drive system was felt distinctly: “brains” she clearly increased.

Clearance of the new Nissan X-Trail has remained the same – 210 mm. Not too little, but against the drifts and snow parapets – weak consolation. Even in combination with all-wheel drive All Mode 4×4 i. The consequences are quite serious departure – Minimum: cracked part of the molding on the front bumper, a little jam “bank” of the cavity and tore several clips clip on plastic protection engine compartment

Work variator XTronic liked us another Qashqai. On the X-Trail uses the same continuously variable transmission Jatco, but with different settings. And they differ not only from those on the model Qashqai. CVT to version 2.5 using a shortened main steam: 5.7 versus 6.4 on a modification to the engine MR20D. And for the turbodiesel (recall that the variator is also possible for the front wheel drive car with a turbodiesel, which will not be in Russia) ratio even shorter – 5.6! It is a pity, however, that we do not get such a vehicle; it must be quite nimble.

Moves pendants X-Trail, of course, very small. But combined with successful settings variator and all-wheel drive that is enough to cope with very serious diagonal display

But until we do, and provided an opportunity to test only the petrol versions, leaving even the all-wheel drive turbo to “handle” for later. Hustler how are they? Wonders of the two-liter modification we did not expect. Remembering dynamics Qashqai with a similar pair of “motor – variator” wait some special hurried from X-Trail is clearly not worth it. Its not. This is – a car for the city. For the lazy traffic lights starts and slow movement in the flow of power and torque is enough. But for the sharp acceleration or overtaking on the highway want to output the motor to maximize impact. It actively promotes the variator, in response to full throttle with pleasure throws the tachometer needle to the mark of 6000 rev / min. But there is more noise than the stroke corresponding hysterical voice engine acceleration is still there. Confirms “concerns” and formal specifications: 12.1 seconds to “hundreds” – rather undistinguished result.

Dynamics modification 2.0 is clearly not enough. If the city is felt not so much – it helps quite a reasonable variator – something on the track 144 horsepower is not enough: you push “on the floor”, and a little confused. Whether it version 2.5 – quite another matter! More power, torque and shortened the main pair do their job

Another thing is the 2.5-liter version. From the first meters of motion becomes clear as a self-contained vehicle. Power and torque are not much more than the two-liter car, but coupled with a shortened main couple variator it gives a very tangible result. Vehicle with far more readily responds to an accelerator, acceleration are much easier (especially after 100 km / h), and at full throttle rpm try to stay in the vicinity of the maximum torque (about 4200-4400 revolutions / min), which greatly improves the acoustic situation salon. More solid, correctly perceive this X-Trail, despite the fact that fuel consumption we went parity in both versions – about 10.5 liters per 100 kilometers.

Smooth running in the 2.5-liter version – much better than the two-liter, because the suspension settings are different. This is evident from the first meters way. I wonder what will be the “diesel”. While we ride on it was not possible

Immediately after meeting with the 2.5-liter X-Trail has become clear that it is preferable not only for stock traction, but also on the ride, as well as in terms of information and steering. For those interested in the “same” suspension Qashqai and X-Trail has such information: some details in spite of the external similarity, have different numbers in catalogs, and, consequently, different calibration and settings. Moreover, different suspension and all have versions available. It is this, together with an increase in curb weight, apparently, gives such an effect: X-Trail 2.5 on the move is seen much more comfortable X-Trail 2.0. Especially great “top” crossover smoothes the road fines, while the car with the engine 2.0 in some detail conveys fine “comb” and stones in the interior. The average roughness of the X-Trail passes just “five”, and only very large pit respond noticeable impacts. In this special claims-handling no one modification crossover. Behavior of course, the response to steering wheel enough even on ice and snow tires and roll in corners quite small (but very slippery). Stabilization system works correctly and is not sharply, always on time podtormazhivaya right wheel. You can disable it and try X-Trail in the slide.

On snowy and icy roads Karelia X-Trail allow you to move at a very decent speeds, almost completely without noticing. Clear control, logical responses and good noise isolation doing their job

In turn crossover comes with a little lazy, with a slight drift of the front axle, but then changed to the nature of understeer neutral, and “X” to slide all four wheels – smooth, predictable, easily. It is interesting to observe the distribution of torque between the axles on slippery surfaces on the dashboard display. Thus, at the time of the demolition of the system All Mode 4×4 i throws a moment ago, and when skidding completely removes the cravings to the rear wheels so that the driver could pull the car the front wheels. But it is all much, if not go into details and specially to attend. Feels the same – just a logical and understandable work-wheel drive, which allows a very gambling behavior behind the wheel of this Nissan X-Trail at its absolute complaisance.

Output

So what’s the bottom line? Is the new X-Trail is so similar to the Qashqai, maybe, and it makes no sense to pay more? After reading this material, you are able to assess whether the “X” is different from his younger “brother.” Exterior, interior details so some of the same units – that’s all the similarities. At the same time, X-Trail is much roomier inside, its interior is decorated with better materials and more on the trunk of almost 150 liters. Gasoline engines for the X-Trail considerably upgraded and CVT and AWD have different gear ratios and settings.

The luggage compartment of the new X-Trail is 497 liters. A special regiment, with which you can create a multi-level space. The maximum amount of the same, with second row seats folded, is now 1,982 liters

In addition, a high level of customization options within the model X-Trail. Thus, depending on the modification, cars have different tuned suspension and a continuously variable transmission. Therefore, we would recommend that future owners to test all versions of the new X-Trail before buying.

Second row seat backs fold in one motion at a ratio of 2: 3 (but separately, you can also remove a large section of the armrest)

And that all this crossover will be as popular, we have no doubt. If only the new prices and the crisis will not have an effect.

2015 Nissan X-Trail New Test Drive 

Supercar of the Test-drive: Lamborghini Huracán

The most complete and harmonious Lambo. What could be better?

It is interesting that at the peak of the evolution of Lamborghini decided to be restrained. Although, if we talk about the company from Sant’Agata, restraint – a relative term. Gallardo lifetime aspired to the nuthouse, Huracán became the starting point for compact Lambo.

Filippo Perini hands design – very eccentric. The car is its emblem, and stylistically it incorporated a space for creativity, with the thought of future versions of the fast. Squat and wide, with the eyes of an insect and familiar hexagonal motifs, Huracán can scream in a whisper.

Detention become form. To disperse hundreds took 3.2 seconds and to 200 km / h – a little less than ten. Maximum speed of three hundred, 325 km / h. I would not call it restraint. And yet the 610-horsepower 5.2-liter V10 is economical and refined – which lacked motor Gallardo. Four-wheel drive smarter and more enjoyable. The new seven-speed Lamborghini Doppia Frizione (LDF) dual-clutch operates smoothly and reliably.

With carbon-ceramic brakes and magnetorheological suspension Huracán, like a machine, leaves a pleasant impression. As a true Lamborghini, it causes the inner thrill, but it is easier to live with it – zapolirovat roughness. And the most beautiful – in units such potential that we tremble at the knees waiting for the new version. Who is the most complete, the most harmonious Lamborghini. I can not imagine what could be better.

Supercar of the Test-drive: Lamborghini Huracán